Re: patches

[Added the list because others may have this question[

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, erick karanja wrote:

> Hello Julia hope you are well.I was seeking clarification on a
> checkpatch warning "Avoid CamelCase: <VME_2eSST>" this is defined as a
> macro in a header file but on further research I have observed that
> "2eSST" is a conventional protocol name. Should I ignore this
> warning.Thank you.

Indeed, you should ignore this warning for the reason you have cited.
Checkpatch is worried about identifiers like ThisIsAVariable, which kernel
style prefers as this_is_a_variable.  When it relates to the hardware
documentation, that needs to stay as is.

thanks,
julia