Re: patches

Thank you for the clarification.

On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 9:24 AM Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [Added the list because others may have this question[
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, erick karanja wrote:
>
> > Hello Julia hope you are well.I was seeking clarification on a
> > checkpatch warning "Avoid CamelCase: <VME_2eSST>" this is defined as a
> > macro in a header file but on further research I have observed that
> > "2eSST" is a conventional protocol name. Should I ignore this
> > warning.Thank you.
>
> Indeed, you should ignore this warning for the reason you have cited.
> Checkpatch is worried about identifiers like ThisIsAVariable, which kernel
> style prefers as this_is_a_variable.  When it relates to the hardware
> documentation, that needs to stay as is.
>
> thanks,
> julia