Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: modify struct field to use standard bool type
Samuel Abraham <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Apr 2025 08:09:07 +0100
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.outreachy,dev.linux.lists.linux-staging,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADYq+fb04joR=8b3zERT-K41y-+Czo=U0_M8GsQWPZbpAov=0Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:06 AM Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote: > > > The struct field uses the uint values 0 and 1 to represent false and > > true values respectively. > > > > Convert cases to use the bool type instead to conform to Linux > > coding styles and ensure consistency. > > This is vague. Ensure consistency with what? You can point out that true > or false was already being used elsewhere in the code. Okay Noted. > > > > > reported by Coccinelle: > > > > Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 2 +- > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c > > index ed6942e289a5..82f54f769ed1 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c > > @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ void update_bmc_sta(struct adapter *padapter) > > psta->qos_option = 0; > > psta->htpriv.ht_option = false; > > > > - psta->ieee8021x_blocked = 0; > > + psta->ieee8021x_blocked = false; > > > > memset((void *)&psta->sta_stats, 0, sizeof(struct stainfo_stats)); > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h > > index b3535fed3de7..63343998266a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct sta_info { > > uint qos_option; > > u8 hwaddr[ETH_ALEN]; > > > > - uint ieee8021x_blocked; /* 0: allowed, 1:blocked */ > > + bool ieee8021x_blocked; > > This declaration doesn't have the same alignment as the others. > > You should also check whether this is a structure that is read from the > hardware. In that case, it would be a concern if the bool field does not > have the same size as the uint one. > > julia Thank you very much. I will confirm and effect the changes Adekunle