Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: media: Remove NULL test on an already tested value

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:19 AM Andy Shevchenko
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:30 AM Abraham Samuel Adekunle
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > When a value has been tested for NULL in an expression, a
> > second NULL test on the same value in another expression
> > is unnecessary when the value has not been assigned NULL.
> >
> > Remove unnecessary duplicate NULL tests on the same value that
> > has previously been NULL tested.
>
> >  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_gmin_platform.c | 2 +-
> >  drivers/staging/media/av7110/sp8870.c                     | 2 +-
>
> Please, split this on per driver basis, as they have different
> maintainers and trees to go through.

Thank you for your review.
I will do that.
>
> ...
>
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_gmin_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_gmin_platform.c
> > @@ -1292,7 +1292,7 @@ static int gmin_get_config_dsm_var(struct device *dev,
> >          * if it founds something different than string, letting it
> >          * to fall back to the old code.
> >          */
> > -       if (cur && cur->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
> > +       if (cur->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING) {
> >                 dev_info(dev, "found non-string _DSM entry for '%s'\n", var);
> >                 ACPI_FREE(obj);
> >                 return -EINVAL;
>
> This change is good.
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/av7110/sp8870.c b/drivers/staging/media/av7110/sp8870.c
> > index 0c813860f5b2..8c5fa5ed5340 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/av7110/sp8870.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/av7110/sp8870.c
> > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static int sp8870_set_frontend(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
> >         }
> >
> >         if (debug) {
> > -               if (valid) {
> > +               {
> >                         if (trials > 1) {
> >                                 pr_info("%s(): firmware lockup!!!\n", __func__);
> >                                 pr_info("%s(): recovered after %i trial(s))\n",  __func__, trials - 1);
>
> But this is not fully done. Why do we need to keep {}? Just shift left
> the code and remove those {} altogether.

Okay I will effect the change.
Thanks

Adekunle