Re: [v3 0/1] Unnecessary code cleanup patches

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 01:02:19AM +0100, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
> > > The patchset modifies unnecessary duplicate NULL test on a
> > > value in an expression, when the value has been NULL tested in a
> > > previous expression.
> >
> > Nit, the subject line does nto have "staging:" in it, so I don't know
> > where this goes.
> >
> > Also, it really reads as "this is an unnecessary patch" :)
>
> Technically, in English, if you have a noun that is being used as an
> adjective and that noun is itself modified in some way, you should use a
> hyphen:
>
> Unnecessary-code cleanup patches

Yes this was what I intended to do. ;)
Thank you
>
> But something like
>
> Remove unnecessary code

Yes perfect.
>
> would have had no ambiguity at all.  Also everything you are doing is a
> patch, so "patches" in the subject line doesn't seem very necessary.
>

Thank you, Julia.

I will update it as necessary.

Adekunle.