Re: [REGRESSION] mainline/master: Apalis iMX6 no longer boots
Thorsten Leemhuis <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jul 2026 19:16:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/16/26 18:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:15:42AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu (OSS) wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:34:32AM -0300, Leonardo Costa wrote: >>>> We are seeing a regression on Apalis iMX6 where the kernel >>>> doesn't boot in the newest v7.2-rc1 (it was working before, in >>>> v7.1). The device tree being used is the imx6q-apalis-eval.dtb. >>>> The kernel configuration >>>> used is the one shown below: >> ... > >>> Can somebody confirm that reverting 610fa91d9863 fixes this >>> regression, or at least that 610fa91d9863^ works and 610fa91d9863 >>> fails? >> >> Sorry for this severe regression. I have posted a fix that has been >> tested on my i.MX6Q SabreSD board: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/[email protected]/ > > My question was whether somebody had actually bisected to 610fa91d9863 > ("PCI: imx6: Assert PERST# before enabling regulators"). I don't see > anything specific on the mailing list, so I don't know how > 610fa91d9863 got blamed for the regression. That was me and might have been a stupid idea. I normally wouldn't have added this, but a earlier message from Hongxing Zhu sounded a pretty convincingly like something along the lines of "this is the problem I already have a fix for there" -- and then I took the commit-id from there. Sorry. Ciao, Thorsten