Re: [REGRESSION] mainline/master: Apalis iMX6 no longer boots
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:28:58 -0500
| Newsgroups | dev.linux.lists.regressions,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260716172858.GA111215@bhelgaas> |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 07:16:31PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 7/16/26 18:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:15:42AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu (OSS) wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 11:34:32AM -0300, Leonardo Costa wrote: > >>>> We are seeing a regression on Apalis iMX6 where the kernel > >>>> doesn't boot in the newest v7.2-rc1 (it was working before, in > >>>> v7.1). The device tree being used is the imx6q-apalis-eval.dtb. > >>>> The kernel configuration > >>>> used is the one shown below: > >> ... > > > >>> Can somebody confirm that reverting 610fa91d9863 fixes this > >>> regression, or at least that 610fa91d9863^ works and 610fa91d9863 > >>> fails? > >> > >> Sorry for this severe regression. I have posted a fix that has been > >> tested on my i.MX6Q SabreSD board: > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/imx/[email protected]/ > > > > My question was whether somebody had actually bisected to 610fa91d9863 > > ("PCI: imx6: Assert PERST# before enabling regulators"). I don't see > > anything specific on the mailing list, so I don't know how > > 610fa91d9863 got blamed for the regression. > > That was me and might have been a stupid idea. I normally wouldn't have > added this, but a earlier message from Hongxing Zhu sounded a pretty > convincingly like something along the lines of "this is the problem I > already have a fix for there" -- and then I took the commit-id from there. Ah, ok, that explains it, thanks! Hopefully we can get some clear connection in the patch that eventually gets merged.