Re: [PATCH 000/114] clk: convert drivers from deprecated round_rate() to determine_rate()

On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 18:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22/08/2025 15:09, Brian Masney wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 22/08/2025 13:32, Brian Masney wrote:
> >>> 7 of the 114 patches in this series needs a v2 with a minor fix. I see
> >>> several paths forward to merging this. It's ultimately up to Stephen how
> >>> he wants to proceed.
> >>>
> >>> - I send Stephen a PULL request with all of these patches with the minor
> >>>   cleanups to the 7 patches. Depending on the timing, Stephen can merge
> >>>   the other work first, and I deal with cleaning up the merge conflicts.
> >>>   Or he can if he prefers to instead.
> >>>
> >>> - Stephen applies everyone else's work first to his tree, and then the
> >>>   good 107 patches in this series. He skips anything that doesn't apply
> >>>   due to other people's work and I follow up with a smaller series.
> >>
> >> Both cause cross tree merge conflicts. Anyway, please document clearly
> >> the dependencies between patches.
> >
> > This series only touches drivers/clk, so it shouldn't cause any issues
> > with other subsystems, unless there's a topic branch somewhere, or I'm
> > missing something?
>
> Individual maintainers handle subdirectories.

FWI(still)W, I have taken the Renesas SoC-specific patches through
the renesas-clk tree...

> > There are some drivers under drivers/clk/ where there is an entry in the
> > MAINTAINERS file that's not Stephen, although it wasn't clear to me if
> > all of those people will send PULL requests to Stephen. I described on
> > the cover how how the series was broken up.
> >
> >   - Patches 4-70 are for drivers where there is no clk submaintainer
> >   - Patches 71-110 are for drivers where this is an entry in MAINTAINERS
> >     (for drivers/clk)
>
> It's hidden between multiple other descriptions of patches, so I really
> would not think that this means that it is okay by individual maintainer
> to take the patch.
>
> This really should be the one most important part of the cover letter
> for something like this.
> ..

It was indeed rather implicit:

   "Once all of my conversion patches across the various trees in the kernel
    have been merged, I will post a small series that removes the
    round_rate() op from the clk core and the documentation. Here's the
    other patch series that are currently in flight that need to be merged
    before we can remove round_rate() from the core. [...]"

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds