[PATCH RFC xenomai-images 0/5] Test riscv in xenomai-images CI

Tobias Schaffner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups dev.linux.lists.xenomai
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

This is the current state of RISC-V testing in the Xenomai Images CI.

It runs the EVL test suite on both qemu-riscv64 as well as the StarFive
VisionFive2.

See the last successful run here:
https://gitlab.com/Xenomai/xenomai-images/-/pipelines/2460891121

Open points for discussion I would like to gather your input:

1. While I have already proposed a patch for `evl test` that integrates
   an interface for running a stressor in the background during test
   execution, we do not have such a mechanism for latmus.
   Is there a plan to merge latmus into the evl command, as was
   recently done for hectic, or will it remain standalone?
   If it stays standalone: do we want to integrate stress command
   handling, or should we create some kind of wrapper?

2. I do not want to add a fully featured kernel config but would prefer
   either to provide only a defconfig or even set `KERNEL_DEFCONFIG` to
   "" to force a fallback to the kernel version’s defconfig, adding
   snippets for the features we want to enable, as I did for `nfs.cfg`.
   This is related to the "Rework linux-xenomai debug configuration"
   RFC I posted a while ago, where I analyzed how to factor out all debug
   options into a separate snippet to fix the inverted debug enablement
   logic without changing the resulting kernel config. However, I no
   longer think this is the right approach, as I do not want to pull in a
   large number of debug config switches that are unnecessary and only
   present in other architectures for historical reasons.
   I see that altering defconfigs carries the risk of breaking
   downstream setups, but at least for the debug part, I believe we
   should be able to arrange with a snippet smaller than 100 lines.

3. I had to pull in meta-isar to enable the use of the VisionFive2 BSP
   implementation, as I wanted to avoid duplicating it. The implementation
   in meta-isar is outdated and needs updates. While doing so, I will
   also add the second DTB.
   But is pulling in meta-isar an acceptable option at all?

Looking forward to your feedback!

Tobias

Tobias Schaffner (5):
  ci: Build and test the evl risc-v port on qemu
  ci: Fix deploy script to handle multiple DTB files
  ci: Add the starfive visionfive2 board
  recipes-kernel: Move nfs boot configs to own snippet
  recipes-kernel: add debug additions to riscv64_defconfig

 ci/lib/gitlab-ci-base.yml                    |  59 +++-
 ci/lib/kernel/head.yml                       |  26 ++
 conf/machine/qemu-riscv64.conf               |   1 -
 conf/machine/visionfive2.conf                |  18 +
 kas.yaml                                     |   1 +
 kas/board/starfive-visionfive2.yaml          |  15 +
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/amd64_defconfig   |   6 -
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/arm64_defconfig   |   6 -
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/armhf_defconfig   |   6 -
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/common_nodbg.cfg  |   2 +
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/nfs.cfg           |   6 +
 recipes-kernel/linux/files/riscv64_defconfig | 328 +++++++++++++++++++
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-xenomai.inc       |   1 +
 scripts/deploy_to_aws.sh                     |   9 +-
 tests/jobs/xenomai-qemu-riscv64.yml          |  93 ++++++
 tests/jobs/xenomai-starfive-visionfive2.yml  |  69 ++++
 16 files changed, 617 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 conf/machine/visionfive2.conf
 create mode 100644 kas/board/starfive-visionfive2.yaml
 create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/files/nfs.cfg
 create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/files/riscv64_defconfig
 create mode 100644 tests/jobs/xenomai-qemu-riscv64.yml
 create mode 100644 tests/jobs/xenomai-starfive-visionfive2.yml

-- 
2.43.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.