Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] package/heaptrack: new package

Julien Olivain via buildroot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups net.busybox.buildroot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Luca,

Thanks for the patch. I have few comments, see below.

On 11/08/2026 12:15, Luca Ceresoli via buildroot wrote:
> Add heaptrack, a memory allocation tracer toolkit.
> 
> This implementation builds all the command line components, not the
> heaptrack_gui graphical visualization program.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/package/heaptrack/Config.in b/package/heaptrack/Config.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..12e33ff2c219
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/heaptrack/Config.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_HEAPTRACK
> +	bool "heaptrack"
> +	depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
> +	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS # boost, libunwind, elfutils
> +	depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR # boost, elfutils
> +	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS # 
> boost-filesystem

This package is failing to build with uclibc toolchains. See:
https://gitlab.com/jolivain/buildroot/-/pipelines/2762905573

heaptrack uses LM_ID_BASE which is not supported by uclibc:
https://invent.kde.org/sdk/heaptrack/-/blob/master/src/track/heaptrack_env.cpp#L33
https://github.com/wbx-github/uclibc-ng/blob/v1.0.59/include/dlfcn.h#L46-L54

You could either try to fix that issue, or disable the package for
uclibc toolchains by adding:

     depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC # no dlmopen() support

with the corresponding comment.

> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUNWIND_ARCH_SUPPORTS # libunwind
> +	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # libunwind
> +	depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS # libunwind, elfutils
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_IOSTREAMS
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_PROGRAM_OPTIONS
> +	# For heaptrack_print
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_BOOST_FILESYSTEM
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_ELFUTILS
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUNWIND
> +	select BR2_PACKAGE_ZLIB
> +	help
> +	  Heaptrack traces all memory allocations and annotates these
> +	  events with stack traces. Dedicated analysis tools then allow
> +	  you to interpret the heap memory profile to find hotspots,
> +	  memory leaks, allocation hotspots and temporary allocations.
> +
> +	  Zstandard offers better (de)compression performance compared
> +	  with gzip/zlib, making heaptrack faster and datafiles smaller,
> +	  so enabling BR2_PACKAGE_ZSTD is recommended.
> +
> +	  https://apps.kde.org/heaptrack/
> +
> +comment "heaptrack needs a toolchain w/ C++, threads, wchar, gcc >= 
> 4.9, dynamic library"
> +	depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS
> +	depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBUNWIND_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> +	depends on !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP \
> +		|| !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS \
> +		|| !BR2_USE_WCHAR \
> +		|| !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 \
> +		|| BR2_STATIC_LIBS
[...]
> diff --git a/package/heaptrack/heaptrack.mk 
> b/package/heaptrack/heaptrack.mk
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ef12f9d189fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/heaptrack/heaptrack.mk
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +################################################################################
> +#
> +# heaptrack
> +#
> +################################################################################
> +
> +HEAPTRACK_SITE_METHOD = git
> +HEAPTRACK_SITE = https://invent.kde.org/sdk/heaptrack.git
> +HEAPTRACK_VERSION = 3e6cce3d210a6672fe6f92de0bed567c49b7a9c5
> +HEAPTRACK_LICENSE = LGPL-2.1-or-later, GPL-2.0-or-later 
> (heaptrack_interpret)
> +HEAPTRACK_LICENSE_FILES = \
> +	LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-only.txt \
> +	LICENSES/GPL-2.0-or-later.txt \
> +	LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt \
> +	LICENSES/BSL-1.0.txt \
> +	LICENSES/MIT.txt \
> +	LICENSES/Apache-2.0.txt \
> +	LICENSES/BSD-3-Clause.txt
> +HEAPTRACK_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf boost libunwind zlib elfutils

Could you sort dependencies, please?

HEAPTRACK_DEPENDENCIES = host-pkgconf boost elfutils libunwind zlib

> +HEAPTRACK_CONF_OPTS += -DHEAPTRACK_BUILD_GUI=OFF 
> -DHEAPTRACK_BUILD_PRINT=ON

Since it's the first _CONF_OPTS assignement, could you
remove the '+', please?

HEAPTRACK_CONF_OPTS = -DHEAPTRACK_BUILD_GUI=OFF ...

> +
> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_ZSTD),y)
> +HEAPTRACK_DEPENDENCIES += zstd
> +endif
> +
> +$(eval $(cmake-package))
> diff --git a/support/testing/tests/package/test_heaptrack.py 
> b/support/testing/tests/package/test_heaptrack.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..de3d5441efa4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/support/testing/tests/package/test_heaptrack.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +import os
> +
> +import infra.basetest
> +
> +
> +class TestHeaptrack(infra.basetest.BRTest):
> +    # infra.basetest.BASIC_TOOLCHAIN_CONFIG cannot be used as it does
> +    # not include BR2_TOOLCHAIN_SUPPORTS_ALWAYS_LOCKFREE_ATOMIC_INTS
> +    # needed by heaptrack.
> +    config = \
> +        """
> +        BR2_aarch64=y
> +        BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
> +        BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_GETTY_PORT="ttyAMA0"
> +        BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
> +        BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION=y
> +        BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_VERSION_VALUE="6.18.42"
> +        BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_USE_CUSTOM_CONFIG=y
> +        
> BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE="board/qemu/aarch64-virt/linux.config"
> +        BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_NEEDS_HOST_OPENSSL=y
> +        BR2_PACKAGE_HEAPTRACK=y
> +        # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set
> +        BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_CPIO=y
> +        """
> +
> +    def test_run(self):
> +        cpio_file = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", 
> "rootfs.cpio")
> +        kern = os.path.join(self.builddir, "images", "Image")
> +        self.emulator.boot(arch="aarch64",
> +                           kernel=kern,
> +                           kernel_cmdline=["console=ttyAMA0"],
> +                           options=["-M", "virt",
> +                                    "-cpu", "cortex-a57",
> +                                    "-m", "256M",
> +                                    "-initrd", cpio_file])
> +
> +        self.emulator.login()
> +
> +        self.assertRunOk("/usr/bin/heaptrack --version")
> +        self.assertRunOk("/usr/bin/heaptrack /bin/busybox")

Maybe we could make this test slightly more complex,
to have a bit more allocations, and also printing the
recorded data.

For example:

self.assertRunOk("heaptrack -o /tmp/ls.heaptrack ls -al /")
self.assertRunOk("heaptrack_print --file /tmp/ls.heaptrack.gz")

> ---
> base-commit: d4f3bea066947fdee49a12ebd84cba54a872d43f
> change-id: 20260731-heaptrack-cd4f6f8fcec8
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Could you send an updated patch addressing those issues, please?

Best regards,

Julien.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.