Re: [PATCH 7/7] ASoC: dt-bindings: ES8389: Add members about HPF and clock
Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:33:04 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.alsa-project.alsa-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260609-vociferous-thick-lyrebird-d53eda@quoll> |
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:06:23AM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote: > Add members related to HPF and mclk_source Please organize the patch documenting the ABI (DT bindings) before the patch using that ABI. See also: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L46 > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <[email protected]> > --- > .../bindings/sound/everest,es8389.yaml | 23 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/everest,es8389.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/everest,es8389.yaml > index 75ce0bc48..be92014c0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/everest,es8389.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/everest,es8389.yaml > @@ -38,6 +38,27 @@ properties: > description: > Interface power supply. > > + everest,mclk-from-sclk: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag > + description: > + Indicates that SCLK is used as the internal clock. And what happens with mclk in such case? Is it still wired? > + > + everest,hpfl: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8 > + description: > + the HPF value of ADCL. Is HPF value in dB? If so, use proper unit suffix and proper units. > + minimum: 0x00 > + maximum: 0x0f > + default: 0x0a > + > + everest,hpfr: > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint8 > + description: > + the HPF value of ADCR. > + minimum: 0x00 > + maximum: 0x0f > + default: 0x0a > + > required: > - compatible > - reg > @@ -58,5 +79,7 @@ examples: > #sound-dai-cells = <0>; > vddd-supply = <&vdd3v3>; > vdda-supply = <&vdd3v3>; > + everest,hpfl = [0a]; <0xa>? What did you want to say here? Best regards, Krzysztof