RE: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for lib/igt_sto re: Fix unexpected reuse of allocated offset

Hi,

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/170694/
i915.CI.FULL - Re-reported.

Thanks,
Ravali.


From: I915-ci-infra <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Janusz Krzysztofik
Sent: 21 July 2026 18:57
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for lib/igt_store: Fix unexpected reuse of allocated offset

Hi [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>,

On Tue, 2026-07-21 at 12:25 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series:
lib/igt_store: Fix unexpected reuse of allocated offset
URL:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/170694/
State:
failure
Details:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15561/index.html
CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_9015_full -> IGTPW_15561_full
Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_15561_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_15561_full, please notify your bug team ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15561/index.html

Participating hosts (10 -> 10)

No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_15561_full:

IGT changes
Possible regressions

  *   igt@gem_linear_blits@basic:

     *   shard-mtlp: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_9015/shard-mtlp-8/igt@[email protected]> -> SKIP<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15561/shard-mtlp-7/igt@[email protected]>

  *   igt@kms_big_fb@4-tiled-64bpp-rotate-0:

     *   shard-mtlp: PASS<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_9015/shard-mtlp-4/igt@[email protected]> -> INCOMPLETE<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_15561/shard-mtlp-7/igt@[email protected]>

Since none of the above two tests depends on igt_store_word() function
modified by the patch under test, those failures are not related.  Please
update CBL filters and re-report.

Thanks,
Janusz

New tests
...