Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 15/16] arm64: dts: st: support Engicam MicroGEA-STM32MP257-RMM board

Alexandre TORGUE <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Dario

On 7/15/26 08:20, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Support for Engicam MicroGEA-STM32MP257-RMM board with:
> 
>   - 8 GB eMMC Flash
>   - 2 GB LPDDR4 DRAM
>   - CAN
>   - LEDs
>   - LCD panel with touchscreen
>   - Micro SD card connector
>   - Audio codec
>   - Buzzer
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v5)
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Fix touchscreen resolution to 480x854
> - Fix SPI1 CS0 polarity to GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop the clocks property from the sai1 node in stm32mp257-engicam-microgea-rmm.dts
>    to avoid overriding the peripheral bus clock reference defined in the base
>    SoC device tree. Suggested by Sashiko.
> - Reference the existing labeled nodes directly at the root level using
>    &sai1a and &sai1b in stm32mp257-engicam-microgea-rmm.dts instead of
>    redefining the entire node structure and redeclaring the labels. Suggested by Sashiko.
> - Drop the #clock-cells property from sai1a and remove the reference to sai1a from
>    the clocks array in sai1b, relying strictly on the st,sync property to handle
>    internal synchronization.
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/Makefile               |   1 +
>   .../st/stm32mp257-engicam-microgea-rmm.dts    | 319 ++++++++++++++++++

Series is ok, I just have a question regarding board name. Why you don't add the "d" soc information inside the board name as it is done for others STM32 boards ?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.