[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] TAAv5 8
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20191021203440.73dl2q5lucu5eiaq@treble> |
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:33:38PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:01:39PM -0700, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:54:29PM +0200, speck for Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Thu 17-10-19 17:14:07, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Let me know if there are any questions. > > > > > > is there any list of CPUs that would benefit from tsx=auto compared to > > > tsx=on? In other words do we really need both? > > > > Below is the list of TAA affected CPUs that will get TSX_CTRL MSR. > > > > +----------------------------+------------------+------------+ > > | Name | Family / model | Stepping | > > +============================+==================+============+ > > | Whiskey Lake (ULT refresh) | 06_8E | 0xC | > > +----------------------------+------------------+------------+ > > | 2nd gen Cascade Lake | 06_55 | 6, 7 | > > +----------------------------+------------------+------------+ > > | Coffee Lake R | 06_9E | 0xD | > > +----------------------------+------------------+------------+ > > > > tsx=auto on these CPUs will disable TSX. > > tsx=on will keep TSX enabled. [ Please ignore my previous email, it had a glaring typo ] Just to clarify, is this list identical to the list of CPUs which are vulnerable to TAA and have MDS_NO=1? -- Josh