[MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 2/2] more sampling fun 2
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:26:41 -0600
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.lore.historical-speck |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20200225012641.slc34bromzk3yj3l@treble> |
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:10:34AM +0100, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:39:29PM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote: > > The implementation uses srbds_mitigation=.. (the commit comment now updated to > > reflect this) > > Certainly not with "mitigation" in the name. All those switches control > mitigations so there's no need to tautologically have it in the name > too. Why not just srbds= ? That's what Intel calls it, and it would be consistent with some of the other options like mds= and l1tf=. -- Josh