Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add changes to support Channel Separation
"Verma, Devendra" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.dmaengine,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pci |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23-Jul-26 20:58, Frank Li wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 03:56:33PM +0530, Verma, Devendra wrote: >> >> >> On 22-Jul-26 20:52, Frank Li wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 04:46:40PM +0530, Devendra K Verma wrote: >>> >>> Add Koichiro Den, who did many work with this edma driver recently >>> >> >> Sure, thanks! >> >>>> Following changes are made: >>>> o In 'struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs', it is assumed the channel >>>> separation as 256-bytes which is default, but if an IP is >>> >>> channel register space size? >>> >>>> configured for a different size of channel separation then >>>> user can retrieve it using the supported VSEC (0x6). >>>> Modified the struct to work with the channel separation >>>> supported by IP. >>>> CPM6 supports channel separation, default is 512. >>> >>> >>>> o Changes in macros / functions where address of the channel >>>> is accessed based on channel index and direction. It enables >>>> the calculation of the channel reg base address based on >>>> the selected channel separation. >>>> o Struct removed - dw_hdma_v0_ch, dw_hdma_v0_regs >>>> o Functions removed - __dw_regs() >>> >>> Can you summary change and purpose? such as >>> >>> Support difference channel register space size for difference IP. Previous >>> use fix default value 256, CMP6 support difference register space size, >>> which default value is 512. >>> >>> Update channel register base address caluator method by use ch_space_sze >>> and remove unused dw_hdma_v0_ch, dw_hdma_v0_regs. >>> >>> You can rephrase. >>> >> >> Sure, I will rephrase this. Thank you for the suggestion! >> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Devendra K Verma <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 4 ++++ >>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- >>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c | 17 ++++++----------- >>>> drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h | 10 ---------- >>>> include/linux/dma/edma.h | 1 + >>>> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c >>>> index 6295d01ba2f7..ca2a4be2f3a5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c >>>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data snps_edda_data = { >>>> .irqs = 1, >>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 2, >>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 2, >>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 256, >>>> }; >>>> >>>> static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = { >>>> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_mdb_data = { >>>> .irqs = 1, >>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 8, >>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 8, >>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 256, >>>> }; >>>> >>>> static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = { >>>> @@ -139,6 +141,7 @@ static const struct dw_edma_pcie_data xilinx_cpm6_dma_data = { >>>> .irqs = 1, >>>> .wr_ch_cnt = 8, >>>> .rd_ch_cnt = 8, >>>> + .ch_sep_sz = 512, >>>> }; >>>> >>>> static void dw_edma_set_chan_region_offset(struct dw_edma_pcie_data *pdata, >>>> @@ -443,6 +446,7 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, >>>> chip->nr_irqs = nr_irqs; >>>> chip->ops = &dw_edma_pcie_plat_ops; >>>> chip->cfg_non_ll = non_ll; >>>> + chip->ch_sep_sz = vsec_data->ch_sep_sz; >>> >>> >>> This blocks PCI endpoint DMA, this driver is not only used by this. >>> EPC controller will not set this value, so ch_sep_sz will be 0 for EPC >>> controller. >>> >>> Frank >>> >> >> The EPC driver is using the chip->reg_base + reg_offset for computing >> the final addresse and not using the register mappings. If the >> reg_offset are correct then this ch_sep_sz change will not affect the >> EPC driver. > > show me, how work, both use below method to get channel register address > > __dw_ch_regs () { > return dw->chip->reg_base + (ch_base * dw->chip->ch_sep_sz) > } > Yes, the dw_edma_probe() gets called in the EPC driver, I had checked based on the dw_pcie->edma.reg_base. The ch_sep_sz is required. I have added the ch_sep_sz as part of dw_pcie_edma_init_data(). Thanks for the suggestion. -Devendra > Frank > >> >>>> >>>> chip->ll_wr_cnt = vsec_data->wr_ch_cnt; >>>> chip->ll_rd_cnt = vsec_data->rd_ch_cnt; >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c >>>> index 632abb8b481c..3f27a93c4d8c 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c >>>> @@ -23,18 +23,23 @@ enum dw_hdma_control { >>>> DW_HDMA_V0_LLE = BIT(9), >>>> }; >>>> >>>> -static inline struct dw_hdma_v0_regs __iomem *__dw_regs(struct dw_edma *dw) >>>> -{ >>>> - return dw->chip->reg_base; >>>> -} >>>> - >>>> static inline struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem * >>>> __dw_ch_regs(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir, u16 ch) >>>> { >>>> - if (dir == EDMA_DIR_WRITE) >>>> - return &(__dw_regs(dw)->ch[ch].wr); >>>> - else >>>> - return &(__dw_regs(dw)->ch[ch].rd); >>>> + u32 ch_base; >>>> + >>>> + /* >>>> + * For Write, the channel register index starts at >>>> + * wr_base(ch_idx) = (2 * ch_idx) * ch_sep_sz >>>> + * >>>> + * For Read channel, >>>> + * rd_base(ch_idx) = (2 * ch_idx + 1) * ch_sep_sz >>>> + */ >>>> + ch_base = 2 * ch; >>>> + if (dir == EDMA_DIR_READ) >>>> + ch_base += 1; >>>> + >>>> + return dw->chip->reg_base + (ch_base * dw->chip->ch_sep_sz); >>>> } >>>> >>>> #define SET_CH_32(dw, dir, ch, name, value) \ >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c >>>> index dcdc57fe976c..33128685bbd9 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-debugfs.c >>>> @@ -13,22 +13,17 @@ >>>> #include "dw-hdma-v0-regs.h" >>>> #include "dw-edma-core.h" >>>> >>>> -#define REGS_ADDR(dw, name) \ >>>> - ({ \ >>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_regs __iomem *__regs = (dw)->chip->reg_base; \ >>>> - \ >>>> - (void __iomem *)&__regs->name; \ >>>> - }) >>>> - >>>> #define REGS_CH_ADDR(dw, name, _dir, _ch) \ >>>> ({ \ >>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *__ch_regs; \ >>>> + struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *__ch_regs; \ >>>> + off_t __off = (dw)->chip->ch_sep_sz; \ >>>> \ >>>> - if (_dir == EDMA_DIR_READ) \ >>>> - __ch_regs = REGS_ADDR(dw, ch[_ch].rd); \ >>>> + if ((_dir) == EDMA_DIR_READ) \ >>>> + __off *= (2 * (_ch) + 1); \ >>>> else \ >>>> - __ch_regs = REGS_ADDR(dw, ch[_ch].wr); \ >>>> + __off *= (2 * (_ch)); \ >>>> \ >>>> + __ch_regs = ((dw)->chip->reg_base + __off); \ >>>> (void __iomem *)&__ch_regs->name; \ >>>> }) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h >>>> index 7759ba9b4850..2475b8d96133 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-regs.h >>>> @@ -84,16 +84,6 @@ struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs { >>>> }; >>>> } msi_abort; >>>> u32 msi_msgdata; /* 0x00a8 */ >>>> - u32 padding_2[21]; /* 0x00ac..0x00fc */ >>>> -} __packed; >>>> - >>>> -struct dw_hdma_v0_ch { >>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs wr; /* 0x0000 */ >>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch_regs rd; /* 0x0100 */ >>>> -} __packed; >>>> - >>>> -struct dw_hdma_v0_regs { >>>> - struct dw_hdma_v0_ch ch[HDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH]; /* 0x0000..0x0fa8 */ >>>> } __packed; >>>> >>>> struct dw_hdma_v0_lli { >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma/edma.h b/include/linux/dma/edma.h >>>> index 1fafd5b0e315..a6c5728f03d3 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/dma/edma.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma/edma.h >>>> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct dw_edma_chip { >>>> >>>> struct dw_edma *dw; >>>> bool cfg_non_ll; >>>> + u32 ch_sep_sz; >>>> }; >>>> >>>> /* Export to the platform drivers */ >>>> -- >>>> 2.43.0 >>>> >>