Re: [PATCH] generic/301: skip extent count check on btrfs

Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.fstests,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs
Message-ID <20260331200619.buww7bpudldcmxof@doltdoltdolt>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 10:48:48PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 01:40:00PM -0700, Leo Martins wrote:
> > +# btrfs CoW extent allocation depends on transaction commit frequency and
> > +# metadata reservation behavior, so the 2/3 fragmentation threshold (designed
> > +# for XFS cowextsize) is not applicable.
> 
> It really is a quality of implementation issue and not specifically
> designed for XFS.  But I gues it is hard to force quality of
> implementation on specific file systems.
> 
> > +if [ "$FSTYP" != "btrfs" ]; then
> > +	test $new_extents -lt $((internal_blks * 2 / 3)) || echo "file2 badly fragmented"
> 
> Please break the echo into a separate line to keep this readable,
> either by just breaking using \ or by turning this into a proper if
> statement.

Sure, I'll help to change it to:

	test $new_extents -lt $((internal_blks * 2 / 3)) || \
		echo "file2 badly fragmented"

when I merge it.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.