Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper
Anand Suveer Jain <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.fstests,net.sourceforge.lists.linux-f2fs-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-ext4,org.kernel.vger.linux-xfs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29/5/26 12:27, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:05:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote: >> Introduce _loop_image_create_clone() and _loop_image_destroy() to mkfs an >> image file and clone it to another image file, and attach a loop device to >> them. And its destroy part. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> >> --- >> common/rc | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc >> index 79189e7e6e94..d7e3e0bdfb1e 100644 >> --- a/common/rc >> +++ b/common/rc >> @@ -1520,6 +1520,69 @@ _scratch_resvblks() >> esac >> } >> >> +# Create a small loop image, run an optional tuning function ($2) on it, >> +# clone it, and attach both to loop devices, returned in ($1). >> +# Args: >> +# $1: Nameref to return the array of allocated loop devices [base, clone]. >> +# $2: Optional callback function to tune the base filesystem before cloning. >> +_loop_image_create_clone() >> +{ >> + local -n _ret=$1 > > That switch ^^ is very clever. I always wondered how one did indirect > variables in bash. > >> + local pre_clone_tune_func="$2" >> + local img_file=$TEST_DIR/${seq}.img >> + local img_file_clone=$TEST_DIR/${seq}_clone.img >> + local size=$(_small_fs_size_mb 128) # Smallest possible >> + local loop_devs >> + >> + # Since we copy the block device image, we keep its size small. >> + _require_fs_space $TEST_DIR $((size * 1024)) >> + >> + _create_file_sized $((size * 1024 * 1024)) $img_file || >> + _fail "Failed: Create $img_file $size" >> + >> + loop_devs=$(_create_loop_device $img_file) >> + _ret=($loop_devs) > > Should this check that a loopdev actually got created? > Hmm, in the function _create_loop_device(), we are calling _fail if create fails, so no need to duplicate, right? >> + case $FSTYP in >> + xfs) >> + _mkfs_dev "-s size=4096" ${loop_devs[0]} >> + ;; >> + btrfs) >> + _mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]} >> + ;; >> + *) >> + _mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]} >> + ;; >> + esac >> + >> + # Only execute if the function argument is not empty >> + if [ -n "$pre_clone_tune_func" ]; then >> + $pre_clone_tune_func ${loop_devs[0]} >> + fi >> + >> + sync ${loop_devs[0]} >> + cp $img_file $img_file_clone >> + >> + loop_devs="$loop_devs $(_create_loop_device $img_file_clone)" > > local lodev="$(_create_loop_device ...)" > > test -z "$lodev" && _fail "second loopdev not created" > _ret+=("$lodev") > > ? If the second `_create_loop_device()` happens to fail, it will already have called `_fail`, so "second loopdev..." won't be used at all. Thanks, Anand >> + >> + _ret=($loop_devs) >> +} >> + >> +# Teardown loop devices and delete their underlying backing image files. >> +# Accepts a list of loop device paths (e.g., /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1). >> +_loop_image_destroy() >> +{ >> + for d in "$@"; do >> + # Retrieve the path of the backing file >> + local f=$(losetup --noheadings --output BACK-FILE $d) >> + >> + # Detach the loop device from the backing file >> + _destroy_loop_device "$d" >> + >> + # Clean up the backing disk image file >> + [ -n "$f" ] && rm -f "$f" >> + done >> +} >> >> # Repair scratch filesystem. Returns 0 if the FS is good to go (either no >> # errors found or errors were fixed) and nonzero otherwise; also spits out >> -- >> 2.43.0 >> >>