Re: [PATCH v2] common/rc: support f2fs in _require_fanotify_ioerrors()

On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 05:09:12PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 7/17/26 18:47, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:25:37AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 7/7/26 18:13, Anand Suveer Jain wrote:
> >>> On 6/7/26 14:43, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>> f2fs has supported to report fserror, this patch adds support for f2fs
> >>>> in _require_fanotify_ioerrors(), so that we can run generic/791 on f2fs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  common/rc | 3 +++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> >>>> index 494725547..f51ad59f3 100644
> >>>> --- a/common/rc
> >>>> +++ b/common/rc
> >>>> @@ -6257,6 +6257,9 @@ _require_fanotify_ioerrors()
> >>>>  		x="$(_get_fs_sysfs_attr $TEST_DEV err_report_sec)"
> >>>>  		test -n "$x" && return 0
> >>>>  		;;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> +	f2fs)
> >>>> +		x="$(cat /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror)"
> >>>> +		test -n "$x" && return 0
> >>>
> >>> Don't we need to check if /sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror
> >>> is present in the running kernel (there are helpers)
> >>
> >> Hi Anand,
> >>
> >> You mean _has_fs_sysfs_attr()? however, it forces to check first parameter $dev
> >> w/ block device type:
> >>
> >> 	if [ ! -b "$dev" -o -z "$attr" ];then
> >> 		_fail "Usage: _has_fs_sysfs_attr <mounted_device> <attr>"
> >> 	fi
> > 
> > Hi Chao and Anand,
> > 
> > The *_fs_sysfs related helpers were brought in by me in:
> >   commit 2a7b77abcd1dde735186b363da24540706c43b73
> >   Author: Zorro Lang <[email protected]>
> >   Date:   Tue Jul 5 17:30:24 2016 +0800
> > 
> >     xfs: configurable behavior on errors at unmount time
> > 
> > At that time, I didn't think about the "features/" directory.
> > 
> > Now, let me rethink this set of helpers. I feel that the *_fs_sysfs
> > family of functions shouldn't be restricted to the $dev directory,
> > we should remove this restriction.
> > 
> > Following that, we bring in *_fs_sysfs_device (appending the _device suffix)
> > helpers which call *_fs_sysfs(). Also change the test cases who call these
> > functions.
> > 
> > Finally, we can introduce the *_fs_sysfs_features functions (or simply use
> > *_fs_sysfs directly).
> > 
> > Also, we have both *_fs_sysfs_attr and *_fs_sysfs, and the logic between
> > them is somewhat confusing and easy to mix up.
> 
> Zorro,
> 
> It makes sense, and good news to their user. Thanks for the proposal.
> 
> > 
> > I need to write a series of patches to clean up these logic. For this current
> > patch, we can start with a small-scale change first. What do you think?
> 
> So I will use this first:
> 
> f2fs)
>     local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror"
>     if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then
>         return 0
>     fi
>     ;;
> 
> And then waiting for your cleanup? or if you want to clean up this, please do it
> directly while merging.

If f2fs wants to test this feature right away, I can merge your patch now and
clean it up later. If it's not urgent, I'll take care of it all together.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> > 
> >>
> >>
> >>> before reading it?
> >>
> >> How about this?
> >>
> >> f2fs)
> >>     local feat_file="/sys/fs/f2fs/features/fserror"
> >>     if [ -f "$feat_file" ] && [ "$(cat "$feat_file")" = "supported" ]; then
> >>         return 0
> >>     fi
> >>     ;;
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>  	esac
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	_notrun "$FSTYP does not support fanotify ioerrors"
> >>>
> >>
> 
>