Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as rewritten

Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> writes:

> On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 12:29:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>It looks like this is now ready to go?  Any further comments?
>>
> you can add whatever footer is appropriate for "i read it, it seems to 
> make sense, but i didn't double-check" for me.
>
> (same for phillip's new 2-patch series.)
>
> (it feels silly to "spam" the list with such low-value verdicts. i 
> really miss gerrit code review here, where i'd leave a +1 in passing.)

Actually, reducing the signal to a single bit, 'did I or did I not
see a +1 from them?', means Gerrit users see less 'spam' but must
make decisions based on too little signal.  I do not know whether
that is an advantage.

With your email, we can at least discern that your comment is much
closer to an 'Acked-by' than a 'Reviewed-by', and we can respect
that distinction when judging whether there is sufficient consensus
on the list to move the topic forward.

In any case, thank you for reading it over and letting us know that
you found nothing glaringly wrong.  That is indeed valuable
information.

Thanks.