Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2026, #05)

On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 09:45:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * cc/git-shallow-file-wo-value (2026-08-11) 1 commit
>  - git: avoid segfault on "git --shallow-file" without a value
> 
>  The '--shallow-file' option of 'git' command requires a value, but the
>  code did not check the presence of a value and instead segfaulted
>  without one, which has been corrected.
> 
>  Will merge to 'next'?
>  cf. <[email protected]>
>  source: <[email protected]>

This version looks good to me.

> * en/sequencer-lose-pretty-given (2026-08-11) 1 commit
>  - sequencer: remove unnecessary variable setting
> 
>  The setting of a now-unused member revs.pretty_given in the
>  sequencer machinery has been removed.
> 
>  Will merge to 'next'?
>  cf. <[email protected]>
>  source: <[email protected]>

Yeah, this patch looks sensible to me.

> * ps/odb-streams (2026-08-05) 8 commits
>  - odb/streaming: unify function names to create new streams
>  - odb/streaming: rename `struct input_zstream_data`
>  - odb/streaming: rename `struct read_object_fd_data`
>  - odb/streaming: consolidate read and write streams
>  - odb/streaming: rename `struct odb_read_stream`
>  - odb/streaming: support streaming arbitrary object types
>  - odb/streaming: drop `is_finished` field
>  - odb/streaming: track write stream size in the structure
> 
>  The 'struct odb_read_stream' and 'struct odb_write_stream'
>  structures have been consolidated into a single unified 'struct
>  odb_stream' structure, simplifying object database streaming APIs
>  and enabling streaming of arbitrary object types.
> 
>  Will merge to 'next'?
>  cf. <anuBdm29ye_qV_Rq@denethor>
>  source: <[email protected]>

Yup, I think this series should be ready.

> * js/coverity-unchecked-returns-fix (2026-08-12) 12 commits
>  - bisect: handle dup() failure when redirecting stdout
>  - bisect: check get_terms return at all call sites
>  - bisect: check strbuf_getline_lf return when reading terms
>  - transport-helper: warn when export-marks file cannot be finalized
>  - transport-helper: check dup() return in get_exporter
>  - compat/pread: check initial lseek for errors
>  - last-modified: handle repo_parse_commit() failures
>  - reftable tests: check reftable_table_init_ref_iterator() return
>  - reftable/block: check deflateInit() return value
>  - reftable: handle block-writer initialization errors
>  - config: propagate launch_editor() failure in show_editor()
>  - http: die on curl_easy_duphandle failure in get_active_slot
> 
>  A handful of code paths have been corrected to check return values
>  from functions like curl_easy_duphandle(), deflateInit(), lseek(),
>  dup(), and strbuf_getline_lf(), resolving several Coverity warnings
>  about unchecked returns.
> 
>  Will merge to 'next'?
>  cf. <[email protected]>
>  cf. <[email protected]>
>  source: <[email protected]>

I think this series should be ready.

> * tb/send-pack-no-ref-delta (2026-07-12) 4 commits
>  - send-pack: honor `no-ref-delta` capability
>  - pack-objects: support reuse with `--no-ref-delta`
>  - pack-objects: introduce `--no-ref-delta`
>  - t/helper: teach pack-deltas to list delta entries
> 
>  'git send-pack' has been taught to refrain from sending 'REF_DELTA'
>  encoded packfiles when the other side asks it to.
> 
>  Needs review.
>  source: <alQ7WKITYDXfiVn9@com-79390>

In <an0EkMZGEbg6LERc@com-79390> we've agreed that this series can be
evicted for now in favor of
<[email protected]>, as Taylor
still needs some more time to rethink the approach in there.

> * tb/midx-incremental-custom-base (2026-06-12) 3 commits
>  - midx-write: include packs above custom incremental base
>  - midx: pass custom '--base' through incremental writes
>  - t5334: expose shared `nth_line()` helper
> 
>  The 'git multi-pack-index write --incremental' command has been
>  corrected to properly honor the '--base' option.  Previously, the
>  custom base was ignored by the normal write path; packs from layers
>  above the selected base were incorrectly skipped by the pack exclusion
>  logic, and reachability closure for bitmaps was broken.
> 
>  Needs review.
>  source: <[email protected]>

I'll try to have a look at this series later today.

Thanks!

Patrick