Re: [patch] fix kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_[gs]et_regs() - v2

Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>>
>>> Please don't do that, then they'll end up after a 16KB struct, I put
>>> them where they were deliberately.
>> Why does it matter?  I don't see any performance issue, we copy 
>> everything anyway, and this is not a high usage interface.
>
> Well it just makes the generated code uglier.
>

Who cares?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function