Re: [patch] fix kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_[gs]et_regs() - v2

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>>> Please don't do that, then they'll end up after a 16KB struct, I put
>>>> them where they were deliberately.
>>> Why does it matter?  I don't see any performance issue, we copy 
>>> everything anyway, and this is not a high usage interface.
>>
>> Well it just makes the generated code uglier.
> 
> Who cares?

Me :-)

Anyway, ignore it, just leave it as it is.

Cheers,
Jes