RE: [PATCH 0/4] decouple vcpu index from apic id

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Currently vcpu_id is used as an index into vcpus array and as apic id
>> on x86.  This is incorrect since apic ids not have to be continuous
>> (they can also encode cpu hierarchy information) and may have values
>> bigger then vcpu array in case of x2apic. This series removes use of
>> vcpu_id as vcpus array index. Each architecture may use it how it
>> sees fit. x86 uses it as apic id. 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Apart from my minor comments, this looks good, but I'd like to get
> acks from arch maintainers to avoid surprises.
> 
> Xiantao, does setting the bsp id make sense for ia64?

Make sense for ia64, if bsp id is set to 0.
But still have one comment about the patchset, in Patch[3/4], online_vcpus in kvm structure is introduced, but it should have the conflicts with arch.online_vcpus for ia64. So I think it should be fixed before check-in. 
Xiantao