Re: [BUG] two raid consistency bugs

Zhang Boyang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 2026/7/15 18:11, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> That's exactly what I'm doing. I'm not requesting devs to fix this bug 
>> immediately or implement my fancy idea. I wrote two test cases and 
>> hope it will be helpful to btrfs development. It would be better if 
>> these two test cases can be merged to test suite.
> 
> No, we will not push for test cases without a fix.
> 
> There is already a known failure, generic/747, and at least I'm not the 
> only one regretting pushing that.
> 

That's a strange policy. Is this a btrfs policy only or it applies to 
whole xfstests?

>>
>> I even wrote a draft patch to fix the second bug. However, the first 
>> bug is not easily solvable. So I had to discuss possible solutions. If 
>> possible, I would have written‌ a draft patch for the first bug, too.
> 
> This is already what I call fancy ideas.
> 
> Anyway, this will mostly just get yourself ignored if you really choose 
> to start from fancy projects.
> Those long existing problems are still there for a reason.
> 

Ok, the first bug is a bit fancy, but what about the second one? I don't 
think the second bug is hard to solve (if you ignore the first bug).

> If you believe you're smarter than everyone else, then go ahead, no one 
> is going to make you change your mind.
> 

This is a strange accusation‌ and I don't like your attitude. I never 
thought I am smarter than everyone else.


Zhang Boyang
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.