Re: [BUG] two raid consistency bugs

On Jul 15, 2026, at 18:11, Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 在 2026/7/15 19:37, Zhang Boyang 写道:
>> Hi,
>> On 2026/7/15 17:44, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> Personally I like the idea of turning metadata trees into merkle trees (so I wrote it first). But since you are the maintainer, I will let you decide which way is appropriate‌.
>>> 
>>> I'm not the maintainer, I just default to not trust ideas/features from unproven contributors, especially when the idea/feature is not simple.
>>> 
>>> Especially considering the increased patches generated by LLMs.
>>> 
>> I understand your concern.
>>> 
>>> So my suggestion is, if you really want to do long-term contributions, stop coming up with fancy ideas, start from basics like doing proper fstests runs with various combinations, report real bugs and fix simple ones by yourself.
>>> 
>>> Earn your name first then consider fancy ideas.
>>> 
>> That's exactly what I'm doing. I'm not requesting devs to fix this bug immediately or implement my fancy idea. I wrote two test cases and hope it will be helpful to btrfs development. It would be better if these two test cases can be merged to test suite.
> 
> No, we will not push for test cases without a fix.
> 
> There is already a known failure, generic/747, and at least I'm not the only one regretting pushing that.

Then why not delete it ?

> 
>> I even wrote a draft patch to fix the second bug. However, the first bug is not easily solvable. So I had to discuss possible solutions. If possible, I would have written‌ a draft patch for the first bug, too.
> 
> This is already what I call fancy ideas.
> 
> Anyway, this will mostly just get yourself ignored if you really choose to start from fancy projects.
> Those long existing problems are still there for a reason.
> 
> If you believe you're smarter than everyone else, then go ahead, no one is going to make you change your mind.
> 
>> Zhang Boyang