Re: [PATCH] crypto: qce - Remove driver
Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:04:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2026072455-subtly-prayer-0a8a@gregkh> |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:47:48PM +0000, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:14:14 +0200, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> said: > > > > And with the defaults QCE is *never* used. > > > > It's almost EOD here and I'm going to disconnect for the weekend but I just > wanted to say before I leave: this has never been a reason for an aggresive > removal of any driver. We remove drivers when we stop supporting entire > platforms, not mostly unused drivers on actively *supported* platforms where > they can still be used for experimentation and testing. I'm fine with dropping > this from arm64 defconfig but with fixes, the BROKEN tag should be removed > and I definitely object to removing it from the tree. How many people still > use greybus? Should we drop it from the kernel too? And I'm saying it as > a project ARA alumni. :) I agree, if someone is willing to maintain it, and there are actual in-kernel uses of it (meaning not just a stand-alone library that can never be called either by userspace or hardware), it should stay. thanks, greg k-h