Re: [PATCH] crypto: qce - Remove driver
Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:09:32 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-crypto,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260724150932.GA6763@sol> |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 02:47:48PM +0000, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:14:14 +0200, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> said: > > > > > > And with the defaults QCE is *never* used. > > > > > > > It's almost EOD here and I'm going to disconnect for the weekend but I just > > wanted to say before I leave: this has never been a reason for an aggresive > > removal of any driver. We remove drivers when we stop supporting entire > > platforms, not mostly unused drivers on actively *supported* platforms where > > they can still be used for experimentation and testing. I'm fine with dropping > > this from arm64 defconfig but with fixes, the BROKEN tag should be removed > > and I definitely object to removing it from the tree. How many people still > > use greybus? Should we drop it from the kernel too? And I'm saying it as > > a project ARA alumni. :) > > I agree, if someone is willing to maintain it, and there are actual > in-kernel uses of it (meaning not just a stand-alone library that can > never be called either by userspace or hardware), it should stay. What would we be considering the in-kernel uses to be, then? Just wiring it up to the framework is enough, regardless of actual use? - Eric