Re: [PATCH] EDAC/versalnet: Pass flags=0 to memory_failure() for UE errors

Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-edac,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260701214001.GFakWJMcM3nZgQ1ddK@fat_crate.local>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 03:20:31PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
> The MF_ACTION_REQUIRED flag is intended for synchronous exceptions
> where the consuming process must be killed. For EDAC-reported errors
> discovered asynchronously via polling/interrupt, flags=0 is the
> correct choice, matching how other EDAC drivers invoke
> memory_failure().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti Datta <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c b/drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c
> index 97ec05d68bbb..d1af5e175f7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/versalnet_edac.c
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static void handle_error(struct mc_priv  *priv, struct ecc_status *stat,
>  		pfn = PHYS_PFN(pa);
>  
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE)) {
> -			err = memory_failure(pfn, MF_ACTION_REQUIRED);
> +			err = memory_failure(pfn, 0);
>  			if (err)
>  				edac_dbg(2, "memory_failure() error: %d", err);
>  			else
> -- 

A bunch of preexisting issues:

https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260701095040.4139675-1-shubhrajyoti.datta%40amd.com

They need to be addressed first along with everything that is waiting on the
ML. Then new patches ontop.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.