Re: [PATCH] EDAC/fsl_ddr: use non devm for request_irq()
Rosen Penev <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:16:11 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-edac,dev.linux.lists.imx,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKxU2N9_wJt3qQ4rmGX89dmSpMKa-7zOuzDwrnxYbXrBNZ1nQg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 11:49=E2=80=AFAM Frank Li <[email protected]> wr= ote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 06:23:20PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote: > > We need to tear down the irq before edac_mc_free() to avoid a use after > > free on teardown as request_irq uses mci as dev_id. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > > index f4cc89b26954..f1ddd1f47f2a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > > +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > > @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) > > > > /* register interrupts */ > > pdata->irq =3D platform_get_irq(op, 0); > > - res =3D devm_request_irq(&op->dev, pdata->irq, > > + res =3D request_irq(pdata->irq, > > fsl_mc_isr, > > IRQF_SHARED, > > "[EDAC] MC err", mci); > > @@ -639,6 +639,7 @@ void fsl_mc_err_remove(struct platform_device *op) > > > > if (edac_op_state =3D=3D EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) { > > ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, 0); > > + free_irq(pdata->irq, mci); > > here already disable hardware irq. Just call > synchronize_irq() to make sure pending irq handled. AI disagrees with this suggestion: The reviewer's suggestion to just call synchronize_irq() instead of free_irq() is problematic for two reasons: 1. Shared IRQ: The handler is registered with IRQF_SHARED. Disabling the DDR controller's local IRQ output (ddr_out32(..., 0)) prevents this device from asserting the IRQ line, but other devices sharing the same IRQ line can still trigger it. Without free_irq, the handler remains in the shared action list and can be called with a dangling mci pointer after edac_mc_free() =E2=80=94 the very UAF this patch aims to fix. 2. free_irq already synchronizes: free_irq() internally calls synchronize_irq() after removing the action from the descriptor. An explicit synchronize_irq() before free_irq() would be redundant. > > Frank > > > } > > > > ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, > > -- > > 2.55.0 > > > >