Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] riscv32 library enhancements and build fixes

Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 2026-04-25 at 14:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I didn't upstream "lib and lib/cmdline enhancements v9" this cycle.

You don't have to upstream v9. Because v9 is v8 + initial RISC-V build
fix, which is a part of another series (this one) now. The proper sequence
is v8 + this series.

> So can we please sort through these things (and the AI review) before
> adding more?

Not sure about AI but hopefully human should realize that I'm not an
expert in m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here]. Enabling
and running the test on _all_ architectures where it is expected to 
work requires obtaining (or even building by myself) a cross-compiler,
setting up the kernel and QEMU, etc. I've spent a reasonable time with
RISC-V and ARM and hopefully set up a good starting point for 
m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here] maintainers, who are
free to incorporate the test into their target architecture.

I'm going to fix everything I consider reasonable, submit v7 and give up -
because without even a single reply from core RISC-V maintainers, this
just turns into an endless brain masturbation.

Dmitry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.