Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] riscv32 library enhancements and build fixes
Dmitry Antipov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2026-04-25 at 14:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > I didn't upstream "lib and lib/cmdline enhancements v9" this cycle. You don't have to upstream v9. Because v9 is v8 + initial RISC-V build fix, which is a part of another series (this one) now. The proper sequence is v8 + this series. > So can we please sort through these things (and the AI review) before > adding more? Not sure about AI but hopefully human should realize that I'm not an expert in m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here]. Enabling and running the test on _all_ architectures where it is expected to work requires obtaining (or even building by myself) a cross-compiler, setting up the kernel and QEMU, etc. I've spent a reasonable time with RISC-V and ARM and hopefully set up a good starting point for m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here] maintainers, who are free to incorporate the test into their target architecture. I'm going to fix everything I consider reasonable, submit v7 and give up - because without even a single reply from core RISC-V maintainers, this just turns into an endless brain masturbation. Dmitry