Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] riscv32 library enhancements and build fixes
Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-efi,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On Sat, 2026-04-25 at 14:36 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I didn't upstream "lib and lib/cmdline enhancements v9" this cycle. > > You don't have to upstream v9. Because v9 is v8 + initial RISC-V build > fix, which is a part of another series (this one) now. The proper sequence > is v8 + this series. > > > So can we please sort through these things (and the AI review) before > > adding more? > > Not sure about AI but hopefully human should realize that I'm not an > expert in m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here]. Enabling > and running the test on _all_ architectures where it is expected to > work requires obtaining (or even building by myself) a cross-compiler, > setting up the kernel and QEMU, etc. I've spent a reasonable time with > RISC-V and ARM and hopefully set up a good starting point for > m68k/sparc32/xtensa/csky/[your favorite arch here] maintainers, who are > free to incorporate the test into their target architecture. > > I'm going to fix everything I consider reasonable, submit v7 and give up - > because without even a single reply from core RISC-V maintainers, this > just turns into an endless brain masturbation. I believe it's better to issue v10 of that series + v7 of this in one go. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko