Re: [PATCH v5 11/17] crash: Normalize the kexec_load elfcorehdr at load time
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,dev.linux.lists.driver-core,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Low] kexec: elfcorehdr_updated in struct kimage is write-only and unused -- commit 463b7b7692d8e96dc1be8ffaed1b6d0c8d298c9f Author: Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]> crash: Normalize the kexec_load elfcorehdr at load time This commit changes kexec_load to normalize the elfcorehdr at load time instead of waiting for the first crash hotplug event. By doing this while the device_hotplug_lock can be safely taken, it allows hotplug paths to skip CPU events safely and avoid racing with memory hotplug. > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c > index 3c9f4fbbe7ff0..f34fa8dba0288 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c > @@ -457,9 +457,8 @@ void arch_crash_handle_hotplug_event(struct kimage *image, void *arg) > * possible CPUs, there is no need to update the elfcorehdr > * for additional CPU changes. > */ > - if ((image->file_mode || image->elfcorehdr_updated) && > - ((image->hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_CPU) || > - (image->hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU))) > + if (image->hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_CPU || > + image->hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU) > return; [Severity: Low] Does this leave elfcorehdr_updated as a write-only and unused field? Since this patch removes the last reader of image->elfcorehdr_updated, the field is now only written to in crash_handle_hotplug_event() and initialized in kernel/kexec_core.c: kernel/crash_core.c:crash_handle_hotplug_event() { ... image->hp_action = KEXEC_CRASH_HP_NONE; image->elfcorehdr_updated = true; ... } Should the elfcorehdr_updated field be completely removed from struct kimage in include/linux/kexec.h along with its assignments to avoid dead code and structure overhead? -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=11