Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions
"Zack Weinberg" <[email protected]> Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:21:16 -0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-gcc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Denis Zaitsev <[email protected]> writes: >> You could use the "X" constraint, which is supposed to mean "anything" >> and by implication "unused", but it's normally only with scratch >> registers, not memories, and the address reloads don't get deleted. > > Yes, I've tried the "X" - there is no difference from the "m" - all > the same unneded extra code (exactly). I think the most constructive thing for you to do is find out _why_ all this unneeded extra code is being generated for "m" constraints and then submit a patch to fix it. zw