Re: i386 inline-asm string functions - some questions

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:08:50AM +0500, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > Do you mean a kind of a complain that "X" does't work as it should?
> 
> Rather, that it could work better.

Ok.  BTW, I was looking around a little - and it seems that "m" suits
better here than "X" - we deals with a memory operand, not with "Any
operand whatsoever" (according to the documentation).  But you suggest
"X" (and this is not the first time).  Why?