Re: [PATCH 2/6] syscall.h: add syscall_set_arguments() on remaining HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK arches

"Dmitry V. Levin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-hexagon,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 01:04:53PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/08, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >
> >  arch/arc/include/asm/syscall.h       | 14 +++++++++
> >  arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h       | 13 ++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h     | 13 ++++++++
> >  arch/csky/include/asm/syscall.h      | 13 ++++++++
> >  arch/hexagon/include/asm/syscall.h   |  7 +++++
> >  arch/loongarch/include/asm/syscall.h |  8 +++++
> >  arch/mips/include/asm/syscall.h      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/parisc/include/asm/syscall.h    | 12 ++++++++
> 
> Confused... arch/x86 needs syscall_set_arguments() too ?

Sure, all HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK architectures need them, but most of these
architectures already provide them since the previous patch in the series:
[PATCH 1/6] Revert "arch: remove unused function syscall_set_arguments()"


-- 
ldv
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.