Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ptrace: introduce PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO API
Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hexagon,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.linux-api,org.kernel.vger.linux-arch,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-openrisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 01/28, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > * ptrace: Add explicit padding to the end of struct ptrace_syscall_info, > simplify obtaining of user ptrace_syscall_info, > do not introduce PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SIZE_VER0 > * ptrace: Change the return type of ptrace_set_syscall_info_* functions > from "unsigned long" to "int" > * ptrace: Add -ERANGE check to ptrace_set_syscall_info_exit, > add comments to -ERANGE checks > * ptrace: Update comments about supported syscall stops > * selftests: Extend set_syscall_info test, fix for mips n32 Again, I can't review 1-3, I know nothing about the non-x86 architectures. As for 4-6, feel free to add Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>