Re: [PATCH v2 14/28] powerpc: introduce arch_zone_limits_init()
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Jan 2026 12:20:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hexagon,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.linux-alpha,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-cxl,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-openrisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 09:57:34AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote: > Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> writes: > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> > > > > Move calculations of zone limits to a dedicated arch_zone_limits_init() > > function. > > > > Later MM core will use this function as an architecture specific callback > > during nodes and zones initialization and thus there won't be a need to > > call free_area_init() from every architecture. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c > > index 3ddbfdbfa941..32c496bfab4f 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c > > @@ -221,13 +221,23 @@ static int __init mark_nonram_nosave(void) > > * anyway) will take a first dip into ZONE_NORMAL and get otherwise served by > > * ZONE_DMA. > > */ > > -static unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]; > > +void __init arch_zone_limits_init(unsigned long *max_zone_pfns) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA > > + max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = min(zone_dma_limit, max_low_pfn - 1) + 1; > > Hi Mike, > > This doesn't look correct. Isn't the zone_dma_limit value in bytes actually? > Shouldn't it be - > > max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = min((zone_dma_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1, max_low_pfn); You are right, I'll update it for v3. > -ritesh -- Sincerely yours, Mike.