Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] arch, mm: consolidate empty_zero_page
"David Hildenbrand (arm)" <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:47:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-hexagon,dev.linux.lists.loongarch,org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv,org.infradead.lists.linux-snps-arc,org.infradead.lists.linux-um,org.kernel.vger.linux-alpha,org.kernel.vger.linux-csky,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-m68k,org.kernel.vger.linux-openrisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.sparclinux,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/24/26 10:56, Mike Rapoport wrote: > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> > > Reduce 22 declarations of empty_zero_page to 3 and 23 declarations of > ZERO_PAGE() to 4. > > Every architecture defines empty_zero_page that way or another, but for the > most of them it is always a page aligned page in BSS and most definitions > of ZERO_PAGE do virt_to_page(empty_zero_page). > > Move Linus vetted x86 definition of empty_zero_page and ZERO_PAGE() to the > core MM and drop these definitions in architectures that do not implement > colored zero page (MIPS and s390). > > ZERO_PAGE() remains a macro because turning it to a wrapper for a static > inline causes severe pain in header dependencies. That's just what I wanted to ask after looking at it :) > > For the most part the change is mechanical, with these being noteworthy: > > * alpha: aliased empty_zero_page with ZERO_PGE that was also used for boot > parameters. Switching to a generic empty_zero_page removes the aliasing > and keeps ZERO_PGE for boot parameters only > * arm64: uses __pa_symbol() in ZERO_PAGE() so that definition of > ZERO_PAGE() is kept intact. > * m68k/parisc/sparc64/um: allocated empty_zero_page from memblock, > although they do not support zero page coloring and having it in BSS > will work fine. > * sh: used empty_zero_page for boot parameters at the very early boot. > Rename the parameters page to boot_params_page and let sh use the generic > empty_zero_page. > * hexagon: had an amusing comment about empty_zero_page > > /* A handy thing to have if one has the RAM. Declared in head.S */ > > that unfortunately had to go :) > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> [...] > > +#ifndef __HAVE_COLOR_ZERO_PAGE > +extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)]; > +#endif > + > +#ifndef ZERO_PAGE > +#define ZERO_PAGE(vaddr) ((void)(vaddr),virt_to_page(empty_zero_page)) Took me a second ... > +#endif > + > #endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ > > #if !defined(MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS) && !defined(CONFIG_64BIT) > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c > index 1a29a719af58..8ea5b76f317f 100644 > --- a/mm/mm_init.c > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c > @@ -53,6 +53,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mem_map); > void *high_memory; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(high_memory); > > +#ifndef __HAVE_COLOR_ZERO_PAGE > +/* > + * ZERO_PAGE is a global shared page that is always zero: used > + * for zero-mapped memory areas etc.. > + */ I am not so sure of how much value that comment here is. ... and in particular, why it is not next to ZERO_PAGE in pgtable.h? ;) > +unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long)] __page_aligned_bss; Is there a good (or historic) reason why this is not simply uint8_t empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE] __page_aligned_bss; Almost looks to simple, right? So there must be some problem with it :) > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(empty_zero_page); > +#endif Nothing else jumped at me, nice cleanup ... if you get sparc to work :P -- Cheers, David