Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] iio: light: ltr501: Fix sorting order of device arrays

"Andy Shevchenko" <[email protected]> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 07:02:17PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Using alphanumerical sort order for these should help reduce merge
>> conflicts.
>
> ...
>
>>  enum {
>> -	ltr501 = 0,
>> -	ltr559,
>> -	ltr301,
>
>> +	ltr301 = 0,
>
> Is the 0 required? Why?

As for the code produced, it should not make any difference.

I assume it was put here for improved code readability, and I did not
see any reason to change that.

I don't care about it myself, so will be happy to remove it if that is
the preferred style now.

>>  	ltr303,
>>  	ltr329,
>> +	ltr501,
>> +	ltr559,
>>  };

/Esben