Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] HID: steelseries: Add async status interface support
[email protected] Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:29:59 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-input |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(= s) to consider: - [High] The `steelseries_get_sibling_sd` function uses `usb_get_intfdata` = on a sibling USB interface and unconditionally casts the result to `struct = hid_device *`, which leads to type confusion if a different driver binds to= it. - [High] A concurrent sysfs unbind of the HID driver from the sync interfac= e can cause `steelseries_get_sibling_sd` to return a freed `steelseries_dev= ice` (sd) and call `kref_get` on it, leading to a Use-After-Free. -- --- Patch [7]: [PATCH v7 7/8] HID: steelseries: Add async status interface = support --- commit 816a244e480f8271ebf1dbc58fbdbe5e0bdbafab Author: Sriman Achanta <[email protected]> HID: steelseries: Add async status interface support Some headsets expose a second HID interface that sends battery and connection updates on its own. Watching that interface lets the driver stop polling the sync interface. > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-steelseries-arctis.c b/drivers/hid/hid-steel= series-arctis.c > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-steelseries-arctis.c > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-steelseries-arctis.c [ ... ] > @@ -318,6 +320,53 @@ static int steelseries_battery_register(struct steel= series_device *sd) > +static struct steelseries_device * > +steelseries_get_sibling_sd(struct hid_device *hdev, int interface_num) > +{ > + struct usb_interface *intf =3D to_usb_interface(hdev->dev.parent); > + struct usb_device *usb_dev =3D interface_to_usbdev(intf); > + struct usb_interface *sibling_intf; > + struct hid_device *sibling_hdev; > + struct steelseries_device *sd =3D NULL; > + > + sibling_intf =3D usb_ifnum_to_if(usb_dev, interface_num); > + if (!sibling_intf) > + return NULL; [ ... ] > + if (!device_trylock(&sibling_intf->dev)) > + return NULL; > + if (sibling_intf->dev.driver) { > + sibling_hdev =3D usb_get_intfdata(sibling_intf); > + if (sibling_hdev && > + sibling_hdev->driver =3D=3D &steelseries_arctis_driver) { [Severity: High] Is it safe to assume sibling_intf is bound to usbhid here? If an attacker plugs in a crafted USB device, the async interface could be bound to a different driver (like usbfs or usbmouse). Since usb_get_intfdata() is unconditionally treated as a struct hid_device pointer, checking sibling_hdev->driver could result in an out-of-bounds read if the bound driver's data structure is smaller. > + sd =3D hid_get_drvdata(sibling_hdev); > + if (sd) > + kref_get(&sd->refcnt); [Severity: High] Could a concurrent unbind of the HID driver cause a use-after-free on sd? While the USB interface lock (&sibling_intf->dev) is held here, this doesn't serialize against a sysfs unbind of the HID driver. If a user unbinds the HID driver from the sibling interface via sysfs, the HID core's hid_device_remove() calls the driver's remove callback (which drops the refcount and frees sd), and only clears hdev->driver afterwards. This could allow hid_get_drvdata() to return a pointer to a freed steelseries_device, leading to a kref_get() on freed memory. > + } > + } > + device_unlock(&sibling_intf->dev); > + > + return sd; > +} --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803191553.6636= [email protected]?part=3D7