Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpftool: Update comments about skel data maps
Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEf4BzajJQobFoSUE9JxyieKupF5_j7q3jxWMHC8ZqAUcHY0yw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:32 AM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since is_skel_data() includes the non-memory-mapped percpu_array map, the > "memory-mapped maps" in comments are incorrect for percpu data. > > Update "memory-mapped internal maps" to "skel data maps" for better > explanation. What is a "skel data map"? "memory-mapped internal map" is fine as is, leave it be > > Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]> > --- > tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c > index a50540ef6521..e5e82255af24 100644 > --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c > +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c > @@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ static int codegen_datasecs(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name) > return -errno; > > bpf_object__for_each_map(map, obj) { > - /* only generate definitions for memory-mapped internal maps */ > + /* only generate definitions for skel data maps */ > if (!is_skel_data(map, map_ident, sizeof(map_ident))) > continue; > > @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static size_t bpf_map_mmap_sz(const struct bpf_map *map) > return map_sz; > } > > -/* Emit type size asserts for all top-level fields in memory-mapped internal maps. */ > +/* Emit type size asserts for all top-level fields in skel data maps. */ > static void codegen_asserts(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *obj_name) > { > struct btf *btf = bpf_object__btf(obj); > -- > 2.55.0 >