Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Followups for global percpu data series

Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAEf4BzZ0ZU_g6eHnkoBFXfD24rDOBSX7QQFVd60DyNS2S+2m0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 10:32 AM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Address some LLM reviews in
> "[PATCH bpf-next v12 00/10] bpf: Introduce global percpu data" [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
>
> Leon Hwang (5):
>   bpf: Drop duplicate blank line in verifier
>   libbpf: Avoid unnecessary mmap resize for percpu data maps
>   bpftool: Update comments about skel data maps
>   selftests/bpf: Avoid flaky resize value test for percpu data
>   selftests/bpf: Improve readability in iter test for percpu data
>

applied patches 2 and 5, check AI feedback for 4, don't bother with 1 and 3.

>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |  1 -
>  tools/bpf/bpftool/gen.c                       |  4 +-
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        | 17 ++++----
>  .../bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c         | 43 ++++++++++---------
>  .../bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c       | 14 +++---
>  5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.