Re: [PATCH v14 18/22] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to init TDX memory and finalize VM

Ackerley Tng <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CAEvNRgH00s3NWUH8EGUZq3WWweboBcUaTZs_0Cye5D=3o0OALQ@mail.gmail.com>
Xiaoyao Li <[email protected]> writes:

>
> [...snip...]
>
>> +static void tdx_load_private_memory(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>> +{
>> +	struct userspace_mem_region *region;
>> +	int ctr;
>> +
>> +	hash_for_each(vm->regions.slot_hash, ctr, region, slot_node) {
>> +		const struct sparsebit *protected_pages = region->protected_phy_pages;
>> +		const gpa_t gpa_base = region->region.guest_phys_addr;
>> +		const u64 hva_base = region->region.userspace_addr;
>> +		const sparsebit_idx_t lowest_page_in_region = gpa_base >> vm->page_shift;
>> +		void *source_pages = NULL;
>> +		sparsebit_idx_t i, j;
>> +
>> +		if (!sparsebit_any_set(protected_pages))
>
> sparebit_any_set() doens't check if the input is NULL. So we need to
> check it here.
>
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		TEST_ASSERT(region->region.guest_memfd != -1,
>> +			    "TD private memory must be backed by guest_memfd");
>> +
>> +		sparsebit_for_each_set_range(protected_pages, i, j) {
>> +			const u64 size_to_load = (j - i + 1) * vm->page_size;
>> +			const u64 offset =
>> +				(i - lowest_page_in_region) * vm->page_size;
>> +			const u64 hva = hva_base + offset;
>> +			const u64 gpa = gpa_base + offset;
>> +
>> +			if (!kvm_has_gmem_attributes)
>> +				source_pages = (void *)hva;
>> +
>
>> +			vm_mem_set_private(vm, gpa, size_to_load);
>
> So vm_mem_set_private() has to be called at this late stage when run
> with in-place gmem. But for non in-place gmem, we can actually call
> vm_mem_set_private() in __vm_phy_pages_alloc().
>
> Calling vm_mem_set_private() here instead of in __vm_phy_pages_alloc()
> looks like a trick to me.

I thought this is fine because __vm_phy_pages_alloc() seems to be a
rather low-level function, where the responsibility of the function is
just to allocate (for find some physical pages). Calling
vm_mem_set_private() in there seems to be doing too much.

> That is, we cannot set the page as private
> when allocating a guest physical page as protected because if doing so,
> we cannot write the initial content to it.
>

I think calling it here isn't a trick, it's a good way to reuse all the
existing code that builds up the guest image in place. In-place
conversion allows you to set stuff up in shared memory and then convert
everything when you're done and also populate the memory.

> This is the topic about how to implement the infras for in-place gmem,
> not the issue of this series. Let me go read the selftest patches of
> gmem in-place series and we can discuss there.
>
>> +			tdx_init_mem_region(vm, source_pages, gpa, size_to_load);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +void tdx_vm_finalize(struct kvm_vm *vm)
>> +{
>> +	tdx_load_private_memory(vm);
>> +	tdx_vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_TDX_FINALIZE_VM, 0, NULL);
>> +}
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.