Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] console_codes.4: document more xterm codes

On Wednesday 2026-07-08 13:17, Alejandro Colomar wrote:

>>  ESC ] 1 ; \f[I]txt\f[] ST	Set icon name to \f[I]txt\f[].
>>  ESC ] 2 ; \f[I]txt\f[] ST	Set window title to \f[I]txt\f[].
>> -ESC ] 4 ; \f[I]num\f[] ; \f[I]txt\f[] ST	Set ANSI color \f[I]num\f[] to \f[I]txt\f[].
>> -ESC ] 10 ; \f[I]txt\f[] ST	Set dynamic text color to \f[I]txt\f[].
>> +ESC ] 4 ; \f[I]num\f[] ; \f[I]txt\f[] ST	Set color \f[I]num\f[] (0-255) to \f[I]txt\f[].
>
>This seems to reword the description of ESC]4;num;txt, which doesn't
>seem to match the commit message.  Should this go into a separate
>commit?

I had inspected the xterm source code to figure out what codes are available
and what they really do. This naturally led to rewording inaccurate
descriptions in console_codes. I do not think it is necessary to split this
into much more commits. I could might have written

console_codes.4: document more xterm codes and fix some behavioral descriptions

but that gets a little long for a summary line, wdyt?