Re: [PATCH linux-next] thermal/drivers/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm: Add module namespace import for IIO_CONSUMER
Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-iio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le 21/08/2026 à 12:29, Uwe Kleine-König a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 05:05:05PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 02:35:43AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> I did plan for this being a possible issue:
>>>
>>> Ideal is merge
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git #iio-inkern-namespace-ib
>>> to the thermal tree. If I'd called that out originally (or a thermal
>>> rebase is a possibility) it would be cleaner to do this before the
>>> qcom patch adds another user then squash what you have here in the appropriate
>>> patch. Alternative is do it as a merge conflict resolution whilst merging
>>> in that tree. If the second, I'd also mention that in the thermal pull request to
>>> Linus given it's a little unusual.
>>
>> Ah, I did not realize that you had a stable branch with the module
>> namespace patch. Merging that in then applying this to the thermal tree
>> seems like the best course of action. If rebasing is possible, I do not
>> mind this patch being squashed into the original.
>
> FTR, this issue is still present as of next-20260820. Assuming that
> c3dce117333c ("thermal/drivers/qcom: Add support for Qualcomm MBG
> thermal monitoring") is supposed to go into v7.3-rc1, it would be
> awesome to address this before the commit hits Linus' tree.
Rafael ? Do you want to pick it up directly in linux-pm/thermal ?