Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for Samsung Exynos8855 smdk

Peter Griffin <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:08:17 +0100
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <CADrjBPp54oxAfJ9i7VTqCVuCJLq3X5mZPh9wMOMgoa-N1e1Ghw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Krysztof,

On Fri, 10 Jul 2026 at 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/07/2026 11:55, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile           |   1 +
> >>>  .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-pinctrl.dtsi   | 574 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-smdk.dts |  32 +
> >>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855.dtsi    | 204 +++++++
> >>>  4 files changed, 811 insertions(+)
> >>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-pinctrl.dtsi
> >>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855-smdk.dts
> >>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos8855.dtsi
> >>> +       };
> > [snip]
> >>> +
> >>> +       oscclk: clock-oscclk {
> >>> +               compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>> +               clock-output-names = "oscclk";
> >>> +               #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>> +       };
> >>
> >> Small nit, but I believe oscclk node should be ordered alpha-numerically by the
> >> node name. See https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-
> >> style.html
> >>
> > Thanks, will update in v4
>
>
> The node feels ordered, no? clock before cpu?

Yes, good point. I was looking at the label not the node name.

Peter