Re: [PATCH v4 09/39] x86/vdso: Enable sframe generation in VDSO
Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20250124164332.gqgzimfix3vk4bsw@jpoimboe> |
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 05:00:27PM +0100, Jens Remus wrote: > On 22.01.2025 03:31, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h > > index b195b3c8677e..1c354f648505 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h > > @@ -12,8 +12,11 @@ > > * For the vDSO, emit both runtime unwind information and debug > > * symbols for the .dbg file. > > */ > > - > > Nit: Deleted blank line you introduced in "[PATCH v4 05/39] x86/asm: > Avoid emitting DWARF CFI for non-VDSO". Indeed. > > +#ifdef __x86_64__ > > #if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(CONFIG_AS_SFRAME) > > AFAIK the kernel has a minimum binutils requirement of 2.25 [1] > and assembler option "--gsframe" as well as directive > ".cfi_sections .sframe" were introduced with 2.40. True, I'll change it to just '#ifdef CONFIG_AS_SFRAME' since that's what really matters (and 32-bit doesn't support it anyway). > > + .cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame, .sframe > > +#else > > .cfi_sections .eh_frame, .debug_frame > > +#endif > > #define CFI_STARTPROC .cfi_startproc > > #define CFI_ENDPROC .cfi_endproc -- Josh