Re: [PATCH v4 11/39] unwind_user: Add user space unwinding API
Jens Remus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22.01.2025 03:31, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/unwind/user.c b/kernel/unwind/user.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> +* Generic interfaces for unwinding user space
> +*/
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> +#include <linux/unwind_user.h>
> +
> +int unwind_user_next(struct unwind_user_state *state)
> +{
> + struct unwind_user_frame _frame;
> + struct unwind_user_frame *frame = &_frame;
> + unsigned long cfa = 0, fp, ra = 0;
Why are cfa and ra initialized to zero? Where is that important in
subsequent patches?
"[PATCH v4 12/39] unwind_user: Add frame pointer support" does either
unconditionally set both cfa and ra or bail out.
> +
> + /* no implementation yet */
> + -EINVAL;
> +}
Thanks and regards,
Jens
--
Jens Remus
Linux on Z Development (D3303)
+49-7031-16-1128 Office
[email protected]
IBM
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH; Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt; Geschäftsführung: David Faller; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
IBM Data Privacy Statement: https://www.ibm.com/privacy/