Re: [PATCH 09/11] dt-bindings: pwm: apple,s5l-fpwm: Add t6030 and t6031 compatibles
[email protected] Thu, 09 Jul 2026 07:48:11 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-watchdog,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Medium] Mismatch between commit message body and patch contents. The commit message states it adds 'apple,t6030-pinctrl' and 'apple,t6031-pinctrl', but the patch actually adds 'apple,t6030-fpwm' and 'apple,t6031-fpwm'. -- --- Patch [9]: [PATCH 09/11] dt-bindings: pwm: apple,s5l-fpwm: Add t6030 and t6031 compatibles --- commit 311071f5987c86b8cc9cbb237a0d70bae746172d Author: Janne Grunau <[email protected]> dt-bindings: pwm: apple,s5l-fpwm: Add t6030 and t6031 compatibles This commit adds new per-SoC compatible strings for the PWM controllers on Apple silicon M3 Pro, Max, and Ultra SoCs. > The PWM controller on Apple silicon M3 Pro, Max and Ultra SoCs is > compatible with the t8103 (M1) one. Add "apple,t6030-pinctrl" for M3 Pro > and "apple,t6031-pinctrl" for M3 Max and Ultra as per-SoC compatibles. [Severity: Medium] Is there a typo in the commit message description? The text mentions adding "-pinctrl" compatibles ("apple,t6030-pinctrl" and "apple,t6031-pinctrl"), but the patch itself actually adds "-fpwm" compatibles, which seems to be the intended change for this file. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/apple,s5l-fpwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/apple,s5l-fpwm.yaml > index 25ef04b60ca17..dd95037ea5eef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/apple,s5l-fpwm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/apple,s5l-fpwm.yaml > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ properties: > - apple,t8122-fpwm > - apple,t6000-fpwm > - apple,t6020-fpwm > + - apple,t6030-fpwm > + - apple,t6031-fpwm > - const: apple,s5l-fpwm -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709-apple-t603x-initial-devices-v1-0-55b305833123@jannau.net?part=9